Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: pricing compared

For a 30-step coding agent run, Claude Sonnet 5.5 is 1.9x cheaper ($0.83 vs $1.55). Prices verified 2026-10-18.

Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Sonnet 4.6
ProviderAnthropicAnthropic
Input / 1M$2.00$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.10$0.30
Output / 1M$10.00$15.00
Batch discount50%50%
Context window1M1M
Long-context tiernonenone

Cost on real workloads

WorkloadClaude Sonnet 5.5Claude Sonnet 4.6
10,000 chatbot replies
2,000 input + 400 output tokens each, 50% of the prompt cached
$61.00$93.00
One 30-step coding agent run
12K system + tools prompt, 1K output and 3K tool result per step, caching on
$0.83$1.55
1M documents classified (batch)
600 input + 20 output tokens each, batch API where available
$700$1,050

Price is only half the decision: a cheaper model that needs more steps or retries can cost more per finished task. Run your own numbers in the calculator (both models pinned), or see how both rank in the use-case guides.

FAQ

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6?

For a typical 30-step coding agent run with caching, Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $0.83 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $1.55, so Claude Sonnet 5.5 is 1.9x cheaper. Per 1M tokens, Claude Sonnet 5.5 is $2.00 / $10.00 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 is $3.00 / $15.00.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.6: 1,000,000 tokens.